my name is joy ,i am a young lady, i saw ur profile and i have interest in u send u email so that i will give u my pic and tell u more about me if u reply to me at this my email (joydickson110@yahoo.com)

that is the finest man i've ever seen...omg...loves the couple is sooo cute...i want him lisa..!!!!

That is about one of the finest men walking....I wonder if he turns from Clark Kent into a Superman in bed....hmmm looks like he can handle business. Marvin Gaye was a super sexy brother no doubt!

LOL LOOK AT ALL THESE HORNY SELF-HATING SELLOUT BLACK/MIXED WHITE MAN'S WHORES/HOES ARE SO HORNY JUST LIKE DIRTY PORNO STARS AND DONT GIVE A SHIT ABOUT BUT IF IT WAS BLACK MAN WITH NON BLACK WOMEN THEN IT WOULD BE IN A DIFFERENT WAY! THAT IS WHY THEY ARE SINGLE AND WE HATE AND DON'T TRUST THEM!

omg Lisa Bonet is gorgeous and Jason is so sexy.. I am JEALOUS of this couple..lol

Lisa Bonet has always been beautiful. What I respect most about her is she isn't the money and the fame like most celebrities. She marches to the beat of her own drum. Obviously this is what Jason loves about her. To be over 40, she looks fabulous, she takes care of her family, and knows what her priorities are. Gotta respect that.

Yuckkkk, why do they have to be so sucky sucky in the camera though? Dont see other's doing THAT at Premieres a lil ott...however quite a nice couple and fam x

Lisa does look good for her age & Jason is gorgeous. I love how Lisa can keep her man's interest. That's hot. Her and Jason have wedding bands on their ring fingers so, they must be married. Zoe is not cute, pretty, sexy, or even okay to me at all and she never has been. She just looks blah and ew and, I just don't understand why.

==== www.ceohappy.com === ==== www.ceohappy.com === ==== www.ceohappy.com ======= www.ceohappy.com ======= www.ceohappy.com === ==== www.ceohappy.com === ==== www.ceohappy.com === jordan air max oakland raiders $30--39; Ed Hardy AF JUICY POLO Bikini $20; Handbags (Coach lv fendi d&g) $30 T shirts (Polo ,edhardy,lacoste) $15 Jean(True Religion,edhardy,coogi) $30 Sunglasses (Oakey,coach,gucci,Armaini) $15 New era cap $15 Bikini (Ed hardy,polo) $20

show your slim bady with fashion Bikini welcome to this site,all brands Bikini,fashion style,cheap price ==== www.vokoshop.com === jordan air max oakland raiders $30--39; Handbags $30 T shirts $15 Jean(True $30 Sunglasses $15 New era cap $15 Bikini $20 ==== www.vokoshop.com === ----- ~ ¤ ╭⌒╮ ╭⌒╮ ╭⌒╭⌒╮╭⌒╮～╭⌒╮ Air Jordan 35$ ,））））,''）~~ ,''~） ╱◥█◣ ╱◥█◣ Nike 35$ ｜田｜田｜｜田｜田｜ POLO SHIRT 15$ ╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬ 2011 NEWNEW FASHION IN VOKOSHOP

Didnt know that was Roman from the Game!!

Lisa is a stunning women. She has the most beautiful eyes in the game. And Jason, damn! That man is too fine! Happy for Lisa!

==== www.ceohappy.com === ==== www.ceohappy.com === ==== www.ceohappy.com ======= www.ceohappy.com ======= www.ceohappy.com === ==== www.ceohappy.com === ==== www.ceohappy.com === jordan air max oakland raiders $30--39; Ed Hardy AF JUICY POLO Bikini $20; Handbags (Coach lv fendi d&g) $30 T shirts (Polo ,edhardy,lacoste) $15 Jean(True Religion,edhardy,coogi) $30 Sunglasses (Oakey,coach,gucci,Armaini) $15 New era cap $15 Bikini (Ed hardy,polo) $20

Correction - they have two children together, a little boy and a little girl.

Mmmmm...and he looks like a good kisser too. Anybody got a fan?

Okay. This man is fine.. lol and Lisa Bonet looks good to me. You guys have to realize it's been 20+ years since she was on the Cosbys and A Different World, that lady is of an older age now, not 20 something. I like her natural look, I love that she looks cool with her daughter who could really pass as her twin.

Pretty sure Zoe, Lisa Bonet and ol' buddy all got stoned before walking the carpet....everyone's eyes are looking a lil too distant for my tastes!

DAMIT!

Jason is probably the hottest man I've ever seen- period.

Whatever. Jason Momoa is a a punk. Other blogs have pics on this very same red carpet of him kissing co-star Rose McGowan on the lips and then later on in the night grabbing her ass. He is a disrespectful piece of you know what and Lisa can clearly do better.

http://www.globalpolitician.com/2946-hispanic-latin-america-south-america Latino & Hispanic? It’s Time to Rethink these Terms! Michael Grande - 7/5/2005 The words Latino and Hispanic have been so carelessly thrown around, used to label individuals, taken advantage of by some of the popular media (ie: Latin Grammy’s, AOL Latino, and the Hispanic Heritage Awards), and even used by some unknowing people as a tool to define their heritage. Yet do we really know what these words mean? There are over 25 countries where Spanish is either the official, or a commonly spoken language (including areas of the world that people don’t often associate with Spanish, like Andorra or the Philippines), and Spanish is the second most spoken language in the world. Additionally there are myriad regional dialects; some examples are the original Castilian Spanish of Spain (directly descended from the Latin language), Argentinean Spanish with its distinctive Italian flair, and Mexican Spanish with its characteristic blend of indigenous (Native American) words. There is no “typical” skin color for Spanish speakers - they range from the lightest whites to Mediterranean breeds, from those of Indian (Native Central/South American and Caribbean) heritage to black. All of the Spanish-speaking countries have their own unique peoples and their own distinctive cultures – they cannot be broadly and irresponsibly categorized into a “Latino” grouping. It is entirely imprecise to use such broad, vague, inaccurate terminology to categorize people based upon their language (whatever dialect it may be). Oddly enough, the term “Latino(a)” is never (or rarely) used in the USA to refer to Western Europeans such as Spaniards and Italians, when in fact the original Latin cultures lie within Italy, Spain, Portugal, Romania, Andorra, and France. Furthermore, when students arrive at college or pick up a book on European history, they will find that the term Latin, when used to refer to a monolithic culture, will speak of the Ancient Roman society, which is contrary to the ambiguous terminology employed by American media. The term Latin America first came into use in the late 1860’s and was used to describe the French presence in Mexico. This term was later shortened to refer to people from “Latin American” countries; thus solidifying the American misperception of the term. I have many Spanish-speaking friends, all of whom hail from different countries. My ex-college Professor is from Argentina and has almost nothing culturally in common with my friend from Mexico. As a matter of fact they too hate the use of the term Latino; they demand to be referred to according to their country of heritage, and rightly so! Furthermore, the terms Latino and Hispanic have been irresponsibly used as a “minority labeling system.” I find this to be even more reckless because any and all racism boils down to that which it always has: color. Another of my friends hails from Chile and has red hair and blue eyes, but according to popular media, a job application, or a government form, she is Latina or Hispanic, two terms that she earnestly hates because they pay no credence to her unique culture. Somehow I don’t think she was the minority prototype that they were looking for, but possibly that’s because the terminology is so rampantly and incorrectly used. Racism is despicable in any form, but if these silly questions are still going to be asked on government forms and job applications then they should address that which is truly in question: race. Anyone who hails from Central/South America or the Caribbean who is dark-skinned is likely to be either in part or fully of Indian heritage. Instead of making tons of superfluous categories on forms, why not just leave two boxes: Native American (North/Central/South/Caribbean) and African American? The other day I heard someone say, “Did you know that Latinos constitute the second largest minority population in America?” I thought to myself, “This is ridiculous.” Nobody needs to be forced into an inappropriate minority mentality; how has American cultural ignorance become so pervasive? Who are the minorities? The indigenous (native) population or the mestizo (mixed) population? Who exactly does this refer to? It’s so confusing. I am 100% Italian American. I speak both Spanish and Italian fluently. Since Italy is the patriarch of the Latin Culture, am I a minority too? This has become a very perplexing issue indeed. In Western Europe the term Latin(o)(a) is commonly used to refer the cultures of Italy, Spain, Portugal, Romania, and France. Additionally Europeans are shocked at how the term is used in America and who the term has been used to label. The term Latino(a) refers to the Latin culture, a culture that originally flourished in Italy during Roman times. It was during that time that the Romans spread the Latin language throughout Western Europe; the language then morphed into the modern Romance Languages such as Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, and French. In essence, the Italians are the original Latinos, and the only people who should be termed “Latino(a)” are those whose ancestry stems from Western Europe or those who have strong cultural ties to Latin Culture. Why would someone so irresponsibly refer to an indigenous Mexican as “Latino” when he has his own ancient, Pre-Columbian Heritage, ie: Aztec, or Mayan? Why would someone use the term to refer to someone of indigenous Peruvian heritage when he has his own Incan heritage? Why would someone label an indigenous-blooded Puerto Rican as “Latino” when his bloodline lies with the Borinquen Indians? People need to wake up and get educated on this issue. How many North Americans would like to be referred to as “Norths” or “Anglos” based upon our geographical location or our mother tongue? I for one, would not! The spread of such inaccurate terminology only helps to perpetuate myths that prevail in our society. Cultural ignorance seems to be a popular phenomenon in the U.S.A. Americans do not have the right to irresponsibly use terminology that attempts to alter history. We have the resources to become culturally educated; let’s use them and begin to express our heritage by country, not vague, “media and commerce friendly” generalities. If indeed we chose to speak of “Latinos,” using such a generalist quip, a quick reference term for all those who trace their roots to Latin America., then we should include the maternal Latin countries in that group: Italy, Spain, Portugal, even France. There is a pervasive Latin cultural flow that began in those countries and spread to Latin America. Latinos wouldn’t be “Latinoamericano” without the Europeans. Since the word “Hispanic” originally came from Spain as an adjective for linguistic purposes and is derived from the Roman name for their prized province “Hispania,” I guess we should look at England’s Roman name – “Britannia.” It appears then, according to Hispanic rhetoric that all speakers of English, regardless of culture, race, ethnicity, or geography should be called “Britannic.” So from India to America – I guess I should now present the list of BRITANNICS…. I think you’ll begin to see for yourself just how silly the modern-day, American usage of the words Hispanic and Latino has become… The English-speaking Countries: • Antigua & Barbuda • Australia • Bahamas,The • Bangladesh • Barbados • Belize • Bermuda • Botswana • Brunei • Cameroon • Canada • Cayman Islands • Dominica • Fiji • Gambia,The • Ghana • Gibraltar • India • Ireland • Jamaica • Kenya • Lesotho • Liberia • Malawi • Malta • Mauritius • New Zealand • Nigeria • Pakistan • Papua New Guinea • Philippines • Seychelles • Sierra Leone • South Africa • Sri Lanka • Swaziland • Tanzania • Trinidad and Tobago • Uganda • United Kingdom • United States • Zambia • Zimbabwe * Chart from: http://www.aneki.com/english.html Michael Grande is currently a graduate student of Literature and Culture. In addition to English, he also speaks Italian, Spanish, French and basic Latin. In the past, he's been published in Manchester Times.